<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Singers&#039; Hub - Topic: working on new original song - Clarity in a Cage</title>
	<link>http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The #1 Community For Singers.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.1</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Phil Moufarrege on working on new original song - Clarity in a Cage</title>
        	<link>http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1522</link>
        	<category>Singing</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1522</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>your music is sounding really good too, I'm off to bed, have a good night.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:10:54 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>OwenKorzec on working on new original song - Clarity in a Cage</title>
        	<link>http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1521</link>
        	<category>Singing</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1521</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Phil Moufarrege said </strong></p>
<p>Hi Owen.  I really like how you're paying attention to the nuances of your delivery instead of throwing the sound out.  With the "GET" I am imaginging that may be most likely you just not engaging enough volume.  If you sing that louder it should find the right spot. A lot of your EEs and OOs were doing nicely and sounded very natural.  There are a few spots where you open a bit too wide and lose the "focus" on your resonance that we worked on.</p>
<p>In our lesson together I felt you were in an even better spot with your voice when I was helping guide you, perhaps review that video again (it was 2 sessions ago I believe).</p>
<p>You've improved a lot man.  I'm really proud of you.  You are sounding so much more natural with your voice compared to your older recordings.  You're thinking like a singer now.  Your song is really good too.</p>
<p>The time you put into this is worth it dude, you are improving a lot.  Bravo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Phil. Everything you've helped me with has really accumulated to this.</p>
<p>Yea it was interesting because I nailed that "get" in the lesson, the resonance was more focused that anything I've ever sung, but I have had trouble recreating that! I'll definitely review the video.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:49:30 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Phil Moufarrege on working on new original song - Clarity in a Cage</title>
        	<link>http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1520</link>
        	<category>Singing</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1520</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Owen.  I really like how you're paying attention to the nuances of your delivery instead of throwing the sound out.  With the "GET" I am imaginging that may be most likely you just not engaging enough volume.  If you sing that louder it should find the right spot. A lot of your EEs and OOs were doing nicely and sounded very natural.  There are a few spots where you open a bit too wide and lose the "focus" on your resonance that we worked on.</p>
<p>In our lesson together I felt you were in an even better spot with your voice when I was helping guide you, perhaps review that video again (it was 2 sessions ago I believe).</p>
<p>You've improved a lot man.  I'm really proud of you.  You are sounding so much more natural with your voice compared to your older recordings.  You're thinking like a singer now.  Your song is really good too.</p>
<p>The time you put into this is worth it dude, you are improving a lot.  Bravo.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:31:14 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>OwenKorzec on working on new original song - Clarity in a Cage</title>
        	<link>http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1519</link>
        	<category>Singing</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1519</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>interesting, listening again on another day, now the second link is my favorite take...</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:17:34 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>OwenKorzec on working on new original song - Clarity in a Cage</title>
        	<link>http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1517</link>
        	<category>Singing</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thesingershub.com/forum/singing/working-on-new-original-song-clarity-in-a-cage/#p1517</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Okay so I basically just did a long session recently working on these vocals, just to practice the interpretation of it. Thought I'd share some of the vocal takes I liked from it and ask for feedback.</p>
<p>ordering the links from my most favorite take to least favorite (out of the best four) but it's a really tough call...curious if someone has a different preference.</p>
<p>Critique away! If you only have time for one, listen to the first link</p>
<p><a href="https://app.box.com/s/6g8e779rj2xyjx8araqhc53ypk5qyeha" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://app.box.com/s/6g8e779rj2xyjx8araqhc53ypk5qyeha</a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.box.com/s/354sitn4s5z6hd5rbsfx8u3g1o1bn2nd" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://app.box.com/s/354sitn4s5z6hd5rbsfx8u3g1o1bn2nd</a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.box.com/s/nvz1kfudcc4ueuul7latzkqd3ssluof9" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://app.box.com/s/nvz1kfudcc4ueuul7latzkqd3ssluof9</a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.box.com/s/1blal4puwsu2cm8wxm5n18aekvjbfdox" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://app.box.com/s/1blal4puwsu2cm8wxm5n18aekvjbfdox</a></p>
<p>But ultimately I'm thinking of redoing it all in a new session - maybe go for a slightly slower tempo, record it live with the piano and vocals together, fix a few things I still couldn't get right (that "I want to GET out of this house" phrase...I still couldn't get that "GET" to sound natural!!!), and get more authentic emotion into it.</p>
<p>Also a cool story of the composition of this, I wrote this for an assignment at Berklee where the teacher said "set a timer and write a song in 45 minutes". And this is what came from that, 90% of this was written in that 45 minutes. Then months later I went back and tweaked the details, mostly just deciding the exact piano chords and I changed two lyrics, but that was all I had to do.</p>
<p>I highly recommend this kind of process to any intermediate/advanced songwriter. Wait until you have a have a really good first idea, that's the trick to making it work - and then immediately set a timer and go for 45 minutes straight and try to have everything finished by the end. Live with that for a while, then revisit it later on and fix whatever you have to.</p>
<p>The biggest benefit I felt from this is that I tapped into my true influences more rather than trying to force my musical aesthetic to be something different than what it truly was.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:09:15 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>